|
UNISEX AND GENDER PARITY
!! draft working page !!
Unisex toilets provide intrinsic
gender parity. |
| OVERVIEW
RECOMMENDATIONS
DISCUSSION
While a small list, the position paper you sent could
take a lot of time to address. Let me start with the first
and likely the most important issue.'gender parity'
>In answer to your question, one of my most recent sources was the
>2003 International Building Code (IBC). *Is there a newer one
than >that?*
Yes - The 2003 IPC is current. [Note: Actual code in the
Int'l Plumbing
Code]
>As I recall the 2003 IBC requires more WC's for men and women than
>had previously been required in stadiums, plus more for women.
Yet
>it still calls for equal numbers of fixtures for men and women in
>nightclubs, bars, taverns, restaurants, and food courts.
Below is 'cut & paste' from the 2003 IPC where more toilets fixtures
are
required for women then men
===================================
Theaters usually with fixed seats and other buildings for the performing
arts and motion pictures, Nightclubs, bars, taverns, dance halls
and buildings for similar purposes Restaurants, banquet halls and food
courts Auditoriums without permanent seating, galleries, exhibition
halls, museums, lecture halls, libraries, arcades and gymnasiums
Passenger terminals and transportation facilities Places of worship and
other religious services. Churches without assembly halls
Coliseums, arenas, skating rinks, pools
and tennis courts for indoor sporting events and activities Stadiums,
amusement parks, bleachers and grandstands for outdoor sporting events
and activities.
===================================
The IPC, at least in theory, should provide formulas for the amount of
'toilet fixtures' needed to satisfy each genders requirement rather then
have one gender be factor of the other. At the moment I don't
think there is enough documentation to support an argument that the
requirement that women's fixtures should be some product more for women
then for men. We need support documentation, and preferable what
we should be saying is that in such and such a situation women need X.
To make the case, lets take at dormitories. Currently there must
be 1 toilet for every 10 students and 1 shower fixture for every 8.
Using the 'twice as many for women argument' that would be 1 toilet
every 5 women. I know ' the more the merrier' but would if be
responsible for ARA to back an action that would most like drive up the
cost of going to college unless we know it's a problem.
|
|